05 / STATEMENT → PRECEDENT → DECISION

A line.
Its history.
Your decision.

See a statement line beside its prior treatment. Check the suggested account, make a correction, and keep held items out of the export.

Try the bank review
Working model · sample dataSource first · human always
WL / BANK-REVIEWILLUSTRATED WORKFLOW
AUG / STATEMENT
07 AUG
RECEIPT
+ 450.00
09 AUG
SUPPLIER
− 120.00
11 AUG
TRANSFER
− 300.00
PRECEDENT → REVIEWKeep the reason.

Sample precedent: an earlier approved supplier purchase used Office supplies.

Office supplies · review complete

DR Office supplies 120.00 CR Bank 120.00

A sample bank statement line is the source. The amount stays attached to its original transaction.

THE WORKFLOW / AND ITS BOUNDARY

A suggestion is
a starting point.

The working model puts the statement, approved historical treatment and current decision side by side. Every displayed transaction and precedent is synthetic.

Inspect suggestions, account and GST treatment. Weak or conflicting history is held. A reviewer can approve, correct or reject; approved-only journal rows appear before the CSV download.

Decisions are session-local and reset on reload. A production workflow would need its own chart of accounts, approved history, GST practice and import template.

KEEP EXPLORING

Different work.
Same review principle.

Invoice matching ↗Proposal preparation ↗Shared knowledge ↗

Don’t hide the exception.
Give it a next step.

The sample working model lets you inspect, correct and approve each line yourself.

Try the bank review